Senate passes a “right to try” bill; Harm to patients comes next

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Patients for whom there are no existing treatments watch with desperation as a potentially helpful new drug spends years working its way from a lab bench, through clinical trials, and finally to the FDA, where reviewers consider it for approval.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Kelly McBride Folkers
Research associate, Division of Medical Ethics, NYU School of Medicine
Lisa Kearns
Senior research associate, Division of Medical Ethics, NYU School of Medicine
Alison Bateman-House
Assistant professor in the Division, co-chair of NYU's Working Group on Compassionate Use and Pre-Approval Access.
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

The long-awaited results from the RASolute 302 trial—a phase III clinical trial evaluating daraxonrasib, a RAS inhibitor, for the treatment of patients with previously treated, metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma—have been read out. 
At a lecture at Yale Cancer Center recently, Robert A. Winn brandished a copy of a 32-year old booklet titled “Cancer at a Crossroads: A Report to Congress for the Nation,” using it as a show-and-tell prop in arguing that America’s cancer program is once again at a crossroads and therefore in urgent need of strategic thinking (The Cancer Letter, April 10, 2026).
Kelly McBride Folkers
Research associate, Division of Medical Ethics, NYU School of Medicine
Lisa Kearns
Senior research associate, Division of Medical Ethics, NYU School of Medicine
Alison Bateman-House
Assistant professor in the Division, co-chair of NYU's Working Group on Compassionate Use and Pre-Approval Access.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login