The Cancer Letter wins investigative, design awards

The Cancer Letter won four 2019 Dateline Awards from the Washington, D.C. Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists:

Investigative Journalism, Newsletter/Trade Publications, first place, for “When Surgical Innovation Kills,” by Matthew Ong
Front Page Design, Newsletter/Trade Publications, first place, by Jacqueline Ong and Katherine Goldberg
Photo Illustration, Newsletter/Trade Publications, first place, by Katherine Goldberg
Series, Newsletter/Trade Publications, finalist, for “From Rhetoric to Harm,” by Paul Goldberg and Matthew Ong

Ong has won six Dateline Awards over the past five years. This is the third time Ong has won a first-place Dateline Award for his investigative work on minimally invasive surgery and cancer-related outcomes.

Ong’s series has also received awards from six organizations, including the National Press Club, the national Society of Professional Journalists, and the National Institute for Health Care Management (The Cancer Letter, How Medical Devices do Harm, 2014-2017; When Surgical Innovation Kills, 2018-2019).

This is the second consecutive year The Cancer Letter has won first-place design awards.

Here are a few of The Cancer Letter’s award-winning covers published in 2018:

DOWNLOAD THE PDF

Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Podcast

Cliff Hudis on how AI in cancer care is “inevitable”—and ASCO is working to make it safer

“Our goal was very clear from the beginning, which was to develop a user-friendly simple chat-like interface that would provide specific high-quality answers to questions that our members would bring, utilizing only our content,” said Clifford A. Hudis, CEO of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and executive vice chair of the Conquer Cancer Foundation.

October 22, 2025

Vol.51 No.38

Clinical Regulatory News Trials & Tribulations

Under the lens: Taking a close look at the NIH and FDA declarations on animal-based research

In April 2025, announcements from the two most influential biomedical agencies in the US, the FDA and the NIH, declared that both will seek to reduce and minimize animal-based testing and experimentation. These declarations sparked joy in some circles, and deep concern in others that was reflected in a 28% fall in the share price of Charles River Labs (NYSE: NYSE:CRL).

October 17, 2025

Vol.51 No.38

By Edison T. Liu

News Analysis Regulatory News

How animal testing became a MAHA political wedge issue
While cancer scientists say NIH, FDA moves are premature, animal rights advocates say changes aren’t drastic enough

Bowing to the growing animal rights movement, FDA and NIH have made policy changes to discourage animal testing, instead favoring alternative research models.

October 17, 2025

Vol.51 No.38

By Claire Marie Porter and Jacquelyn Cobb

Guest Editorial

Study finds no correlation between cancer burden in catchment areas and cancer centers’ CCSG funding

When the idea of looking at cancer center funding and the cancer burden of cancer center catchment areas came to us in the summer of 2024, we lived in a different context.

October 17, 2025

Vol.51 No.38

By Todd Burus, Caree McAfee and Pamela C. Hull

Why both somatic and germline genomic profiling are essential for precision oncology

Over the past three decades, cancer genetics has transformed precision oncology. Germline testing has advanced from single-gene Sanger sequencing to parallel sequencing of hundreds of genes, while tumor (somatic) testing has expanded with the rise of targeted therapies based on point mutations, copy number changes and other alterations.

October 17, 2025

Vol.51 No.38

By Heather Hampel and David W. Craig

Cancer Policy

Dems push GOP to extend ACA credits as part of a deal to end the government shutdown

Millions of Americans with Affordable Care Act marketplace health insurance will face higher costs next year if Congress doesn’t extend enhanced premium tax credits that have made the plans more affordable for low- and middle-income enrollees.

October 17, 2025

Vol.51 No.38

By Claire Marie Porter

The Cancer Letter wins investigative, design awards

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Cliff Hudis on how AI in cancer care is “inevitable”—and ASCO is working to make it safer

Under the lens: Taking a close look at the NIH and FDA declarations on animal-based research

How animal testing became a MAHA political wedge issue
While cancer scientists say NIH, FDA moves are premature, animal rights advocates say changes aren’t drastic enough

Study finds no correlation between cancer burden in catchment areas and cancer centers’ CCSG funding

Why both somatic and germline genomic profiling are essential for precision oncology

Dems push GOP to extend ACA credits as part of a deal to end the government shutdown

Renew today!

Subscriber content

Never miss an issue!

Login

The Cancer Letter wins investigative, design awards

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Cliff Hudis on how AI in cancer care is “inevitable”—and ASCO is working to make it safer

Under the lens: Taking a close look at the NIH and FDA declarations on animal-based research

How animal testing became a MAHA political wedge issueWhile cancer scientists say NIH, FDA moves are premature, animal rights advocates say changes aren’t drastic enough

Study finds no correlation between cancer burden in catchment areas and cancer centers’ CCSG funding

Why both somatic and germline genomic profiling are essential for precision oncology

Dems push GOP to extend ACA credits as part of a deal to end the government shutdown

Never miss an issue!

Login

How animal testing became a MAHA political wedge issue
While cancer scientists say NIH, FDA moves are premature, animal rights advocates say changes aren’t drastic enough