Annals of Unintended Consequences: How FDA regulations undermine the biosimilar marketplace and the BPCIA

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

In March 2010, as part of Affordable Care Act, Congress passed a well-conceived and critical legislative bill, the Biologic Pricing and Competition Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA)i. Despite its intentions, BPCIA has been instituted so that it complicates prescribing while increasing health care costs and reducing competition, rather than resulting in the anticipated benefits.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Howard S. Hochster, MD
Distinguished Professor of Medicine; Associate director for clinical research and director, GI Oncology; Rutgers Cancer Institute; Director of oncology research, RWJBarnabas Health
Michael P. Kane, RPh, BCOP
Executive director, Oncology Pharmacy Services & Research Shared Resource, Rutgers Cancer Institute
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

FDA has granted an accelerated approval to afamitresgene autoleucel (Tecelra), a melanoma-associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4)-directed genetically modified autologous T-cell immunotherapy, for adults with unresectable or metastatic synovial sarcoma who have received prior chemotherapy, are HLA-A*02:01P, -A*02:02P, -A*02:03P, or -A*02:06P positive and whose tumor expresses the MAGE-A4 antigen as determined by FDA-approved or cleared companion diagnostic devices.
Howard S. Hochster, MD
Distinguished Professor of Medicine; Associate director for clinical research and director, GI Oncology; Rutgers Cancer Institute; Director of oncology research, RWJBarnabas Health
Michael P. Kane, RPh, BCOP
Executive director, Oncology Pharmacy Services & Research Shared Resource, Rutgers Cancer Institute

Login