Cancer clinical trials shouldn’t discriminate—but they do

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

In 2004, doctors told my husband Mike there was nothing more they could do—the pancreatic cancer he was diagnosed with would soon take his life. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Erin Miller
Development manager, Lazarex Cancer Foundation
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

In patients with high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer, post-surgery, or adjuvant, treatment with trastuzumab emtansine, also referred to as T-DM1) reduced the long-term risk of death or invasive disease by 46% and improved survival compared to trastuzumab alone, according to the final results of the phase III KATHERINE clinical trial led by researchers from the University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center. 
The Groupe d’Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, also known as the Head and Neck Oncology and Radiotherapy Group or GORTEC, announced that the randomized phase III CheckMate -9KW/NIVOPOSTOP GORTEC 2018-01 trial evaluating nivolumab (Opdivo) as a post-operative treatment component for resected patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck with high risk of relapse met its primary endpoint of disease-free survival across all comers.  
Erin Miller
Development manager, Lazarex Cancer Foundation

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login