Cancer clinical trials shouldn’t discriminate—but they do

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

In 2004, doctors told my husband Mike there was nothing more they could do—the pancreatic cancer he was diagnosed with would soon take his life. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Erin Miller
Development manager, Lazarex Cancer Foundation
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Technological innovations are often hailed as transformative tools capable of revolutionizing healthcare. From gene editing for conditions like sickle cell disease to AI predicting hospital readmissions, to telemedicine expanding healthcare access, these advancements have the potential to change the way we treat diseases. 
Genmab A/S announced on March 17 updated data from cohort B1 of the phase I/II RAINFOL-01 study of rinatabart sesutecan, an investigational folate receptor-alpha-targeted, TOPO1 antibody-drug conjugate that showed Rina-S 120 mg/m2 every three weeks resulted in a confirmed objective response rate of 55.6% (95% CI: 30.8-78.5) in heavily pre-treated ovarian cancer patients regardless of FRα expression levels. 
Erin Miller
Development manager, Lazarex Cancer Foundation

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login