Cancer clinical trials shouldn’t discriminate—but they do

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

In 2004, doctors told my husband Mike there was nothing more they could do—the pancreatic cancer he was diagnosed with would soon take his life. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Erin Miller
Development manager, Lazarex Cancer Foundation
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Tagrisso (osimertinib) demonstrated a sustained, clinically meaningful overall survival benefit at eight years compared to placebo in the adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage (1B, 2, and 3A) epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer after complete tumor resection with curative intent, according to the updated exploratory results from the ADAURA phase III trial. 
Congress settled the FY26 question in February, with NCI receiving $7.352 billion, an increase of $128 million over the prior year. After a year in which cancer center directors spent an extraordinary share of their leadership attention defending the research enterprise, that outcome deserves to be called what it was: a win.
Erin Miller
Development manager, Lazarex Cancer Foundation

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login