Tasigna Shows High Response, PFS Benefit Compared to Gleevec in Phase III CML Study

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Six-year results from the randomized phase III ENESTnd study continued to show higher rates of early, deep and sustained molecular responses when using Tasigna (nilotinib) compared to Gleevec (imatinib mesylate) in newly-diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Last week, FDA granted accelerated approval to Replimune Group Inc. for it’s biologic, RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec), following the FDA Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee’s 10:3 vote in support of the biologic in combination with nivolumab for the treatment of advanced melanoma in patients who have progressed on prior anti-PD-1 therapy.
FDA has granted an accelerated approval to RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) following the agency’s Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee’s 10:3 vote in support of the biologic in combination with nivolumab for the treatment of advanced melanoma in patients who have progressed on prior anti-PD-1 therapy.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login