Study finds no correlation between cancer burden in catchment areas and cancer centers’ CCSG funding

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

When the idea of looking at cancer center funding and the cancer burden of cancer center catchment areas came to us in the summer of 2024, we lived in a different context. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Todd Burus, PhD
Data scientist, Markey Cancer Center
Caree McAfee, MA, CHES
Administrative director, Operations and Evaluation, Markey Cancer Center
Pamela C. Hull, PhD
Professor, University of Kentucky, Associate director, Population Science and Community Impact, Markey Cancer Center
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

In a poignant keynote punctuated with anecdotes about grief, American Society of Clinical Oncology’s immediate past president Eric Small emphasized that the annual conference is not just about scientific discovery, but about a responsibility to translate discoveries into better outcomes for cancer patients globally. 
“Backwater to Blockbuster,” the first de novo book published by the Cancer History Project, traces the evolution of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital to its current status of a powerhouse of research in pediatric cancer.
Todd Burus, PhD
Data scientist, Markey Cancer Center
Caree McAfee, MA, CHES
Administrative director, Operations and Evaluation, Markey Cancer Center
Pamela C. Hull, PhD
Professor, University of Kentucky, Associate director, Population Science and Community Impact, Markey Cancer Center

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login