The pit in my stomach used to come once a year.
The United States has a translation problem. Scientific breakthroughs in oncology are accelerating, but clinical trial infrastructure hasn’t kept pace.
The cost of underfunding research and the lingering dread of unstable funding
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print
President, chief executive officer, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Table of Contents
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
FDA has released a final guidance for drug sponsors conducting clinical trials of psychedelics, including psilocybin, LSD, and MDMA, for the treatment of psychiatric and substance abuse disorders.
The Trump administration’s effort to give political appointees greater authority over federally-funded science is colliding with fierce objections from researchers, universities, medical organizations, and members of Congress.
In 1971, the National Cancer Act set the United States on a path to confront one of its most formidable public health challenges. More than five decades later, the progress is undeniable. The latest 2026 report from the American Cancer Society shows continued declines in overall cancer mortality and improvements in survival for many major cancer types. Recent advances in early detection, prevention, and treatment are saving lives.
The early years of a scientific career can be unforgiving.
At a recent House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee hearing titled “Maintaining America’s Leadership in Biomedical Innovation: FDA’s Role in Advancing U.S. Drug Development,” lawmakers examined ways to increase efficiency and speed across early-stage clinical trial development.
