KEYNOTE-598: Keytruda + Yervoy did not improve OS, PFS in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Keytruda (pembrolizumab) in combination with Yervoy (ipilimumab) did not improve overall survival or progression-free survival, and instead added toxicity compared with Keytruda as monotherapy in the phase III KEYNOTE-598 study.

The phase III study evaluates Keytruda in combination with Yervoy compared with Keytruda monotherapy as first-line treatment in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer without EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations and whose tumors express PD-L1 (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥50%) .

Keytruda is sponsored by Merck, and Yervoy is sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb.

The median OS was 21.4 months for patients randomized to Keytruda in combination with Yervoy versus 21.9 months for those randomized to Keytruda monotherapy (HR=1.08 [95% CI, 0.85-1.37]; p=0.74). Additionally, the median PFS was 8.2 months for patients in the combination arm versus 8.4 months for those in the Keytruda monotherapy arm (HR=1.06 [95% CI, 0.86-1.30]; p=0.72).

“In KEYNOTE-598, the addition of ipilimumab to Keytruda did not improve overall survival or progression-free survival, and patients who received the combination were more likely to experience serious side effects than those who received Keytruda monotherapy,” Michael Boyer, chief clinical officer and conjoint chair of thoracic oncology of Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia, said in a statement.

These results were presented in the presidential symposium at the IASLC 2020 World Conference on Lung Cancer hosted by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer on Jan. 29 and published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The study was discontinued due to futility based on the recommendation of an independent data monitoring committee, which determined the benefit/risk profile of KEYTRUDA in combination with Yervoy did not support continuing the trial. The DMC also advised that patients in the study discontinue treatment with Yervoy/placebo.

KEYNOTE-598 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03302234) is a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial designed to evaluate Keytruda in combination with Yervoy compared to Keytruda monotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC without EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations and whose tumors express PD-L1 (TPS ≥50%). The dual primary endpoints are OS and PFS. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, duration of response and safety.

The study enrolled 568 patients who were randomized 1:1 to receive Keytruda (200 mg intravenously [IV] on Day 1 of each three-week cycle for up to 35 cycles) in combination with Yervoy (1 mg/kg IV on Day 1 of each six-week cycle for up to 18 cycles); or Keytruda (200 mg IV on Day 1 of each three-week cycle for up to 35 cycles) as monotherapy. Non-binding futility criteria for the study were based on restricted mean survival time (RMST), an alternative outcome measure estimated as the area under the survival curve through a fixed timepoint.

The pre-specified criteria were differences in RMST for Keytruda in combination with Yervoy and Keytruda monotherapy of ≤0.2 at the maximum observation time and ≤0.1 at 24 months of follow-up.

As of data cut-off, the median study follow-up was 20.6 months. Findings showed the median OS was 21.4 months for patients randomized to Keytruda in combination with Yervoy (n=284) versus 21.9 months for those randomized to Keytruda monotherapy (n=284) (HR=1.08 [95% CI, 0.85-1.37]; p=0.74).

The differences in RMST for Keytruda in combination with Yervoy and Keytruda monotherapy were -0.56 at the maximum observation time and -0.52 at 24 months, meeting the futility criteria for the trial and confirming the benefit/risk profile of the combination did not support continuing the study.

Additionally, the median PFS was 8.2 months for patients randomized to Keytruda in combination with Yervoy versus 8.4 months for those randomized to Keytruda monotherapy (HR=1.06 [95% CI, 0.86-1.30]; p=0.72). In both arms of the study, ORR was 45.4%; the median DOR was 16.1 months for patients randomized to Keytruda in combination with Yervoy versus 17.3 months for those randomized to Keytruda monotherapy.

Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

For nearly 25 years, business executive Lou Weisbach and urologist Richard J. Boxer have argued that finding the money to finance the cures for devastating diseases is not as difficult as it appears. To start finding the cures, the U.S. Department of the Treasury needs to issue some bonds—$750 billion worth. Next, you hire CEOs—one...

There is general agreement that the United States spends too much on health care, especially on pharmaceuticals.  But what we spend on drugs is not simply a function of price. If eggs double in price, people can simply cut the number of eggs they eat in half.  Simply stated, cost is the product of (price per unit times the number of units purchased). 
What did President Richard M. Nixon and Senator Edward M. Kennedy have in common? They each played a pivotal role in the passage of the National Cancer Act signed by Nixon on Dec. 23, 1971. The NCA established the National Cancer Program authorizing the initial investment in the NCI-designated Cancer Centers Program. 
When I first proposed targeting PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) as a therapeutic approach, the response I got was: “No one will ever make a drug against PCNA. It’s undruggable.” The protein lacks enzymatic activity, has a disordered region, and binds to over 200 other proteins within the cell. From a traditional drug development perspective, these characteristics made PCNA an impossible target.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login