publication date: May. 24, 2019

Dana-Farber wins legal dispute over PD-1/PD-L1 patents; BMS set to lose exclusive license

By Paul Goldberg

So, you’ve finished your copy of the Mueller Report and you long for another great read from the same publisher—the U.S. government.

If you are that person, click here and help yourself to last week’s ruling in Dana-Farber Cancer Institute’s suit seeking rights to PD-1/PD-L1 patents.

On May 17, Chief U.S. District Court Judge Patti B. Saris of the U.S. District Court of the District of Massachusetts produced 111 pages of riveting nonfiction, ruling that Dana-Farber is entitled to intellectual property rights to six patents that claim methods of treating cancer by administering anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies.

This legal tussle has a Stockholm angle.

The 2018 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine went to one of the defendants, Tasuku Honjo, of Kyoto University, who shared the prize with Jim Allison, now of MD Anderson Cancer Center. (Allison’s work plays no role in this dispute.)

Some readers of Saris’s multi-layered exegesis report getting a good laugh, while others shake their heads in amazement. As scientists increasingly work in close international collaborations, how do you tease out contributions that merit patent claims—and the Nobel Prize—from those that don’t?

Here are the … Continue reading Dana-Farber wins legal dispute over PD-1/PD-L1 patents; BMS set to lose exclusive license

To access this members-only content, please log in.
Institutional subscribers, please log in with your IP.
If you're not a subscriber why not join today?
To gain access to the members only content click here to subscribe.
You will be given immediate access to premium content on the site.
Click here to join.

Copyright (c) 2018 The Cancer Letter Inc.