USC comparison study of leading targeted therapies for ALK+ lung cancer could lead to better treatment decisions

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

A head-to-head comparison of five leading treatments for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer could help oncologists fine-tune first-line TKI selection beyond what’s been seen in clinical trials alone, according to a study conducted by a team of researchers from the Keck School of Medicine of USC, the USC Alfred E. Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and the USC Shaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics have conducted.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

In patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager, plus durvalumab as first-line maintenance therapy extended median overall survival by more than eight months, more than tripled progression-free survival, and reduced the risk of death by 58% compared to durvalumab alone, according to the results of the phase III open-label, multicenter, randomized DeLLphi-305 study. 
Divarasib, a next-generation KRAS G12C inhibitor, lowered the risk of disease progression or death by 42% and the overall risk of death by 44% in people with previously treated KRAS G12C-mutated non-small cell lung cancer, according to the results from the phase III Krascendo 1 study. The therapy demonstrated the superior efficacy compared with current standard of care KRAS G12C inhibitors. 

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login