When radiology fails to fix clinical trial imaging workflow at sites…

What most think, why it’s wrong, and what cancer centers really need

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Radiology departments have tried for years to “own” or “fix” clinical trials imaging assessment workflows by extending clinical tools (PACS, worklists, dictation systems) and habits (speed, seamlessness, few clicks) into the research world. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Jeff Sorenson
CEO and co-founder, Yunu
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Patients with pancreatic cancer who received the experimental drug elraglusib, alongside standard chemotherapy, were twice as likely to be alive after one year of treatment, compared to those receiving chemotherapy alone, according to the results of a randomized phase II clinical trial conducted by researchers at Northwestern University. The drug also reduced the risk of death by 38%.
Jeff Sorenson
CEO and co-founder, Yunu

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login