When radiology fails to fix clinical trial imaging workflow at sites…

What most think, why it’s wrong, and what cancer centers really need

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Radiology departments have tried for years to “own” or “fix” clinical trials imaging assessment workflows by extending clinical tools (PACS, worklists, dictation systems) and habits (speed, seamlessness, few clicks) into the research world. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Jeff Sorenson
CEO and co-founder, Yunu
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

The NHS-Galleri trial presented at ASCO was the largest, prospective, randomized trial of a multicancer early detection test (MCED) to date. The study enrolled approximately 143,000 asymptomatic adults (ages 50-77) and was the first of its kind to assess clinical utility of an MCED test for cancer screening. 
The ASCERTAIN-V phase I/II clinical trial, which evaluated the first all-oral regimen of decitabine-cedazuridine plus venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy, demonstrated favorable response rates and survival with expected myelosuppressive effects.
Jeff Sorenson
CEO and co-founder, Yunu

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login