Impact of Proposed Cuts to NIH Budget:

More Than Just About Cancer

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

If enacted, the proposed budget reduction of $5.8 billion to the National Institutes of Health will slow research, deprive patients afflicted with cancer of hope, and deliver a devastating blow to our science workforce and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This proposed reduction directly counters the wisdom of the U.S. Congress, who less than a year ago overwhelmingly passed the 21st Century Cures Act.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Congress settled the FY26 question in February, with NCI receiving $7.352 billion, an increase of $128 million over the prior year. After a year in which cancer center directors spent an extraordinary share of their leadership attention defending the research enterprise, that outcome deserves to be called what it was: a win.
Harold P. Freeman, a surgeon who started his career in Harlem, where, in addition to performing surgeries, he pioneered the system of patient navigation, and who studied health disparities and served as president of the American Cancer Society and chair of the President’s Cancer Panel, died on Aug. 11. He was 93.
Karen E. Knudsen, PhD
Director, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University
Chi Van Dang, MD, PhD
Director, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania
Richard I. Fisher, MD
Director, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System
Edward Chu, MD
Interim director, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Dario Altieri, MD
Director, Wistar Institute Cancer Center

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login