Impact of Proposed Cuts to NIH Budget:

More Than Just About Cancer

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

If enacted, the proposed budget reduction of $5.8 billion to the National Institutes of Health will slow research, deprive patients afflicted with cancer of hope, and deliver a devastating blow to our science workforce and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This proposed reduction directly counters the wisdom of the U.S. Congress, who less than a year ago overwhelmingly passed the 21st Century Cures Act.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

In April 2025, announcements from the two most influential biomedical agencies in the US, the FDA and the NIH, declared that both will seek to reduce and minimize animal-based testing and experimentation. These declarations sparked joy in some circles, and deep concern in others that was reflected in a 28% fall in the share price of Charles River Labs (NYSE: NYSE:CRL). 
Over the past three decades, cancer genetics has transformed precision oncology. Germline testing has advanced from single-gene Sanger sequencing to parallel sequencing of hundreds of genes, while tumor (somatic) testing has expanded with the rise of targeted therapies based on point mutations, copy number changes and other alterations. 
Karen E. Knudsen, PhD
Director, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University
Chi Van Dang, MD, PhD
Director, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania
Richard I. Fisher, MD
Director, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System
Edward Chu, MD
Interim director, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Dario Altieri, MD
Director, Wistar Institute Cancer Center

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login