The Cancer Letter

The leading source for information on the issues that shape oncology since 1973

Guest Editorial

Impact of Proposed Cuts to NIH Budget:

More Than Just About Cancer

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print
BYLINE
IN THIS ISSUE
BYLINEDOWNLOAD PDFTABLE OF CONTENTS

If enacted, the proposed budget reduction of $5.8 billion to the National Institutes of Health will slow research, deprive patients afflicted with cancer of hope, and deliver a devastating blow to our science workforce and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This proposed reduction directly counters the wisdom of the U.S. Congress, who less than a year ago overwhelmingly passed the 21st Century Cures Act.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Byline
Karen E. Knudsen, PhD
Director, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University
Chi Van Dang, MD, PhD
Director, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania
Richard I. Fisher, MD
Director, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System
Edward Chu, MD
Interim director, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Dario Altieri, MD
Director, Wistar Institute Cancer Center
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

News Analysis

HHS presents new protein-forward dietary guidelines, turning the food pyramid upside down
The Kennedy guidelines are mum on cancer risks associated with red meat and alcohol

Recently, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. posted a video montage featuring himself shirtless in jeans, working out with Kid Rock. The duo is in a blue-lit grotto with a cold plunge and sauna. Set to Kid Rock’s “Bawitdaba” and intercut with a selection of patriotic imagery, the video ends with the two men in a hot tub, chugging what appears to be milk.
By Claire Marie Porter
Guest Editorial

FDA’s guidance on MRD in MM goes beyond the ODAC vote—and that’s where it matters most
Draft guidance consolidates trial design updates for developers

In January, FDA released a draft guidance entitled “Minimal Residual Disease and Complete Response in Multiple Myeloma: Use as Endpoints to Support Accelerated Approval.” This release came roughly 20 months after the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) voted unanimously that minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, in combination with complete response (CR), is an acceptable primary endpoint to support accelerated approval for multiple myeloma (MM) therapies. 
By Nicholas Richardson
Byline
Karen E. Knudsen, PhD
Director, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University
Chi Van Dang, MD, PhD
Director, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania
Richard I. Fisher, MD
Director, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System
Edward Chu, MD
Interim director, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Dario Altieri, MD
Director, Wistar Institute Cancer Center
Table of Contents

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login

Site license subscribers:
Log in with your IP | Register a sponsored account