Cancer trials are getting harder to complete, suggesting a role for more powerful RWE, AI solutions

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Clinical trials for oncology drugs are running into unique challenges as protocols become more complex and as the number of new investigational agents continues to outpace all other drugs, according to a recent study by Tufts University researchers.

The study, “Protocol complexity and patient enrollment intensity challenges in oncology trials,” was conducted by Zachary Smith, a senior research analyst at Tufts, and led by Kenneth Getz, professor and director of the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Matthew Bin Han Ong
Matthew Bin Han Ong
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

The NHS-Galleri trial presented at ASCO was the largest, prospective, randomized trial of a multicancer early detection test (MCED) to date. The study enrolled approximately 143,000 asymptomatic adults (ages 50-77) and was the first of its kind to assess clinical utility of an MCED test for cancer screening. 
The ASCERTAIN-V phase I/II clinical trial, which evaluated the first all-oral regimen of decitabine-cedazuridine plus venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy, demonstrated favorable response rates and survival with expected myelosuppressive effects.
Matthew Bin Han Ong
Matthew Bin Han Ong

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login