Group chairs propose funding strategy to jump-start correlative studies

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The National Academy of Medicine recognized the value of correlative science in publicly funded clinical trials in 2010, recommending “the incorporation of innovative science into cancer clinical trials through the support and use of biorepositories.” 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Peter J. O'Dwyer, MD
Group co-chair, ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group; Professor of medicine (hematology-oncology), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Presbyterian Medical Center of Philadelphia
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Cornell University has come to an agreement with the Trump administration that will unfreeze the university’s more than $250 million in interrupted federal research funding and “protect Cornell’s students from violations of federal civil rights laws, including from discrimination based on race, sex, or national origin, and promote America’s hardworking farming and rural communities” following accusations of antisemitism and discrimination in admissions.
With major leadership changes, grant disruptions and terminations, and a stoked distrust in science, Steven Artandi, the director of Stanford Cancer Center, worries that young investigators will feel disenchanted by the U.S. research atmosphere and take their work and study elsewhere. 
Peter J. O'Dwyer, MD
Group co-chair, ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group; Professor of medicine (hematology-oncology), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Presbyterian Medical Center of Philadelphia

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login