Opdivo demonstrates superior RFS vs. Yervoy for patients with resected stage III or IV melanoma

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. announced updated results from the phase III CheckMate -238 trial evaluating Opdivo (nivolumab) versus Yervoy (ipilimumab) in patients with stage IIIB/C or stage IV melanoma who are at high risk of recurrence following complete surgical resection.

In updated results from the study, Opdivo continued to demonstrate statistically longer recurrence-free survival of 62.6%, the primary endpoint of the study, versus 50.2% for Yervoy (HR: 0.66, P<0.0001) at a minimum follow-up of 24 months across key subgroups, including disease stages and BRAF mutation status.

No new safety data were generated as part of the 24-month analysis. As previously reported from the 18-month analysis, Opdivo demonstrated a significantly lower rate of adverse events leading to discontinuation (9.7% of patients in the Opdivo arm compared to 42.6% of patients in the Yervoy arm) and treatment-related grade III/IV AEs (14.4% of patients in the Opdivo arm compared to 45.9% in the Yervoy arm).

In the study, Opdivo demonstrated superior RFS versus Yervoy, regardless of disease stage, PD-L1 expression or BRAF mutation status, with RFS rates of 62.6% with Opdivo compared to 50.2% with Yervoy in the intent-to-treat patient population.

In patients with stage IIIB melanoma, RFS rates at 24 months for Opdivo were 70.8% versus 60.7% with Yervoy; for patients with stage IIIC melanoma, RFS rates were 58.0% with Opdivo versus 45.4% with Yervoy; and for patients with stage IV melanoma, RFS rates for Opdivo were 58.0% versus 44.3% with Yervoy. In patients with BRAF mutant melanoma, RFS rates for Opdivo were 61.9% versus 51.7% with Yervoy; in patients with BRAF wild-type melanoma, Opdivo demonstrated a RFS of 63.5% versus 46.2% with Yervoy.

CheckMate -238 is an ongoing phase III, randomized double-blind study of Opdivo versus Yervoy in patients who have undergone complete resection of stage IIIB/C or stage IV melanoma. The trial randomized 906 patients 1:1 to receive either Opdivo 3 mg/kg every two weeks (n=453) or Yervoy 10 mg/kg (n=453) every three weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks starting at week 24.

Patients were treated until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent for up to one year. The primary endpoint is RFS, defined as the time between randomization and the date of first recurrence, new primary melanoma or death. After meeting the primary endpoint, the trial will continue to evaluate for overall survival, a secondary endpoint.

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

When our hematological malignancy testing pilot project began in Eldoret, Kenya, there seemed to be a mismatch in relation to progress in healthcare. The region, like much of sub-Saharan Africa, had been focusing on combatting infectious diseases such as HIV and malaria—which was much-needed—yet cancer care was under-resourced. 
Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming biomedical research and healthcare. Large language models, foundation models, and AI agents are increasingly being deployed to assist with data interpretation, literature review, clinical decision support, and translational research. 
In modern oncology, important insights from clinical trials often emerge years after initial publication. As new therapies extend survival and transition more patients into long-term remissions, clinicians and researchers are increasingly looking beyond initial response rates to understand durability, long-term safety, and even the possibility of a cure. 

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login