Advertisement

Lung cancer risk drops substantially within five years of quitting smoking

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The main findings of a new analysis of the landmark Framingham Heart Study by researchers at Vanderbilt University Medical Center published May 16 by the Journal of the National Cancer Institute shows that the risk of lung cancer drops substantially within five years of quitting.

First author Hilary Tindle, the William Anderson Spickard Jr., MD Professor of Medicine at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and director of the Vanderbilt Center for Tobacco, Addiction and Lifestyl aand her colleagues examined the health records of residents of Framingham, Massachusetts, who have been followed for decades by the Framingham Heart Study.

The study, which is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, helped establish high blood pressure and high cholesterol as key risk factors for cardiovascular disease. But it also tracked cancer outcomes.

The current study looked at 8,907 participants who had been followed for 25 to 34 years. During this period, 284 lung cancers were diagnosed, nearly 93 percent of which occurred among heavy smokers, those who had smoked at least a pack of cigarettes a day for 21 years or more.

Five years after quitting, the risk of developing lung cancer in former heavy smokers dropped by 39 percent compared to current smokers, and continued to fall as time went on. Yet even 25 years after quitting, their lung-cancer risk remained over threefold higher compared to people who had never smoked.

The Framingham study is unique because it asked people about their smoking every two to four years, and could account for increases or decreases in smoking over time.

Current federal guidelines, which mandate insurance coverage of lung cancer screening for current and former smokers, exclude those who haven’t smoked for 15 years or more. Yet four of 10 cancers in heavy smokers in the current study occurred more than 15 years after they quit.

Advertisement

Further study is warranted to determine whether extending the cut-off point for mandated screening would be cost-effective and save lives, the researchers concluded.

The senior author is Matthew Freiberg professor of Medicine and founding director of the Vanderbilt Center for Clinical Cardiovascular Outcomes Research and Trials Evaluation.

Other Vanderbilt co-authors were Pierre Massion, Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor of Medicine; Robert Greevy, associate professor of Biostatistics; Meredith Stevenson Duncan, V-CREATE database administrator; and Suman Kundu, associate database administrator in the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and V-CREATE.

Vasan Ramachandran, principal investigator of the Framingham Heart Study and professor of Medicine at Boston University, also contributed to the study.

Advertisement
Advertisement

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

In his first sit-down interview since beginning his role as FDA commissioner 17 days earlier, Marty Makary, a former Johns Hopkins surgeon and the only Trump pick for HHS whose confirmation received Democratic support, said he would speed up approvals for rare-disease treatments by reducing reliance on animal testing and shifting towards organoids and computational models. 
The American Cancer Society’s recent report on the increasing incidence rates of colorectal cancer in young adults once again rang an alarm bell for adults over 45 to get checked, especially if they are having symptoms. But as an oncologist with more than 40 years of experience, I also believe that this should be a clarion call to scientists and researchers, and for regulators at the FDA.
Advertisement
Advertisement