publication date: Mar. 30, 2018
Duke faces tightened NIH grant oversight over handling of past scientific misconduct
By Paul Goldberg
NIH has imposed tighter financial controls on researchers at Duke University, citing “ongoing issues” related to management of grants.
“While we cannot discuss the details of the ongoing issues with Duke University, we often enhance our degree of grant oversight when concerns arise about an awardee’s ability to effectively and properly manage NIH research funds,” officials from the NIH Office of Extramural Research, said in a written response to questions from The Cancer Letter.
On March 21, Duke announced to the faculty and staff that starting on April 1 NIH grantees “will be required to SEEK PRIOR NIH AUTHORIZATION for all no cost extensions of any final grant budget periods and unobligated balance carryforwards. In addition, Duke also will be required to submit detailed budgets for any modular applications prior to NIH issuing an award (at Just In Time).
“NIH reports that these new requirements are a result of its concerns about Duke’s management of several research misconduct cases and grant management issues that date back to 2010, some of which have been widely reported like the Anil Potti case,” the memo states.
Duke faces a separate whistleblower suit that names the university and researchers Erin Potts-Kant and William Michael Foster. The suit … Continue reading Duke faces tightened NIH grant oversight over handling of past scientific misconduct
To access this members-only content, please log in.
If you're not a subscriber why not join today?
If you believe you should be able to view this area but cannot log in, then please contact us
and we will try to rectify this issue as soon as possible.
To gain access to the members only content click here
You will be given immediate access to premium content on the site.Click here to join.