Group chairs propose funding strategy to jump-start correlative studies

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The National Academy of Medicine recognized the value of correlative science in publicly funded clinical trials in 2010, recommending “the incorporation of innovative science into cancer clinical trials through the support and use of biorepositories.” 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Peter J. O'Dwyer, MD
Group co-chair, ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group; Professor of medicine (hematology-oncology), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Presbyterian Medical Center of Philadelphia
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

With major leadership changes, grant disruptions and terminations, and a stoked distrust in science, Steven Artandi, the director of Stanford Cancer Center, worries that young investigators will feel disenchanted by the U.S. research atmosphere and take their work and study elsewhere. 
Project Purple, a national nonprofit dedicated to empowering the fight against pancreatic cancer, is launching the Pancreatic Cancer Research Recovery Support Grant. The initiative provides up to two years of bridge or rescue funding for promising pancreatic cancer research projects that were disrupted due to administrative funding policy changes at major federal agencies such as the NIH, the Department of Defense, or the National Science Foundation. 
Peter J. O'Dwyer, MD
Group co-chair, ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group; Professor of medicine (hematology-oncology), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Presbyterian Medical Center of Philadelphia

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login