Under the lens: Taking a close look at the NIH and FDA declarations on animal-based research

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

In April 2025, announcements from the two most influential biomedical agencies in the US, the FDA and the NIH, declared that both will seek to reduce and minimize animal-based testing and experimentation. These declarations sparked joy in some circles, and deep concern in others that was reflected in a 28% fall in the share price of Charles River Labs (NYSE: NYSE:CRL). 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Edison T. Liu, MD
Professor, President emeritus, Honorary fellow, The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

On Feb. 3, the House of Representatives passed the Senate Amendment to H.R. 7148, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, by a vote of 217 to 214. Later that day, President Donald Trump signed the bill into law, officially ending the brief partial government shutdown that began on Jan. 31. 
NIH announced Jan. 29 that “Basic Experimental Studies Involving Humans,” also called BESH, will no longer be considered clinical trials and will therefore no longer be subject to the requirements under the NIH definition of a clinical trial, including registration and reporting requirements in ClinicalTrials.gov.
As NCI paylines drop to 4%, cancer centers are tapping into their institutional funds to provide “bridge funding,” typically in $50,000 to $100,000 increments, to enable investigators to keep their labs open until better times return—next year God willing.
Edison T. Liu, MD
Professor, President emeritus, Honorary fellow, The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login