Under the lens: Taking a close look at the NIH and FDA declarations on animal-based research

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

In April 2025, announcements from the two most influential biomedical agencies in the US, the FDA and the NIH, declared that both will seek to reduce and minimize animal-based testing and experimentation. These declarations sparked joy in some circles, and deep concern in others that was reflected in a 28% fall in the share price of Charles River Labs (NYSE: NYSE:CRL). 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Edison T. Liu, MD
Professor, President emeritus, Honorary fellow, The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Rick Pazdur, MD, the newly appointed director for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the FDA, has been described as “greyhound thin” as a result of his dedication to cycling and lifting weights in the gym each day and, for a long time, a vegetarian diet. I first met him when he was the director of the Office of Oncology Drug Products (ODP) within CDER, in 2009.
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and Vinay Prasad, FDA’s chief medical and scientific officer and director of the agency’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, jointly published a letter in The New England Journal of Medicine spelling out the rationale for FDA’s new “plausible mechanism pathway,” aimed at getting bespoke therapies to market without the need for a randomized controlled trial. 
Edison T. Liu, MD
Professor, President emeritus, Honorary fellow, The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login