A study measures the long-term downside of prostate cancer screening

A paper in JAMA Oncology focuses on the harms of overscreening, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

In this week’s issue of JAMA Oncology, there is an important paper that provides information concerning the long-term adverse effects and complications of prostate cancer screening and treatment.1 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Otis W. Brawley, MD, MACP
Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of Oncology and Epidemiology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

EDAP TMS SA, the global leader in robotic energy-based therapies, announced the publication of the full results from the HIFI study in European Urology, which has the highest impact factor amongst scientific journals focused in urology. The study evaluated high-intensity focused ultrasound versus radical prostatectomy as a first line treatment of localized prostate cancer. 
A new study, published in Nature Communications and led by the University of Minnesota Medical School and Duke University, found that a DNA sequencing test for advanced prostate cancer patients can distinguish between patients with poor and favorable prognoses. The new blood-based test — called AR-ctDETECT — is designed to detect and analyze small fragments of tumor-derived DNA in the blood of certain patients with advanced, metastatic prostate cancer.
Otis W. Brawley, MD, MACP
Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of Oncology and Epidemiology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login