ASCO Endorses Joint Guideline for Molecular Testing

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsed a joint clinical practice guideline on molecular testing published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

The guideline focuses on the selection of patients with lung cancer for therapies targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase, and defines which patients should be offered EGFR and ALK genetic testing, and when and how such testing should be performed.

“This guideline is incredibly important, as it increases the ability to personalize lung cancer care and improve outcomes for patients with advanced lung cancer,” said Natasha Leighl, co-chair of the ASCO expert panel that endorsed the guideline.

“It describes the current evidence and helps oncologists and pathologists understand and put molecular testing into clinical practice,” Leighl said. The endorsement was published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The guideline comprises 37 recommendations, consensus opinions, or suggestions. Key recommendations include: offering EGFR and ALK testing to all patients with lung adenocarcinoma irrespective of characteristics such as gender, race and smoking status; the use of a range of testing methods, provided they meet certain technical requirements, with certain types of tests not recommended; adherence to guidance regarding specimen processing, testing validation, quality assurance, and turnaround times for reporting results.

CAP, IASLC and AMP are currently updating their guideline based on new evidence regarding ALK testing, testing for molecular alterations associated with acquired resistance to EGFR and ALK inhibitors, new markers such as ROS1, RET, ERBB2 (HER2), BRAF, MET and next-generation sequence testing.

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

The Trump administration did exactly what it said it would do to disorient anyone involved in making policy or touched by it. The president and his crew have “flooded the zone”—the term and the image are theirs, as is the strategy of dropping a flurry of executive orders and memoranda that shake the foundations of the American system of government, raising questions of legality and constitutionality, and, above all, making it a challenge for anyone to see the entire picture and think strategically.
In two raucous back-to-back hearings on Jan. 29 and Jan. 30, anti-vaccine crusader Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was grilled by members of the United States Senate Finance Committee and the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee as the Trump administration seeks his confirmation as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. 
Over the past century, groundbreaking cancer research in the U.S. has led to life-saving medical advances that benefit patients worldwide. Scientists often devote their lives to making discoveries, putting their scientific endeavors ahead of status, income, or lifestyle. Investigators work tirelessly, often seven days a week, to solve complex medical problems. These efforts often lead to game-changing outcomes that help us understand difficult medical challenges, advance technologies and develop new therapies. 

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login