Ready or not, AI-based decision support tools are entering oncology clinics

Regulators and health systems must adapt

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Urologic oncologist Wayne Brisbane thought his patient might be a good candidate for focal therapy. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
McKenzie Prillaman
McKenzie Prillaman
Reporter
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Technological innovations are often hailed as transformative tools capable of revolutionizing healthcare. From gene editing for conditions like sickle cell disease to AI predicting hospital readmissions, to telemedicine expanding healthcare access, these advancements have the potential to change the way we treat diseases. 
FDA granted traditional approval to Merck’s pembrolizumab (Keytruda) with trastuzumab, fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of adults with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma whose tumors express PD-L1 (CPS ≥1).
The field of surgical oncology has undergone transformative advancements over the last decade. From refining minimally invasive techniques to leveraging immunotherapy and viral oncolytics, our collective goal remains the same: improving patient outcomes while reducing treatment burden. At City of Hope, we have prioritized accelerating the translation of laboratory discoveries into clinical applications, and nowhere is this more evident than in our work with oncolytic viruses, remote surgery, and the integration of AI in surgical decision-making.
McKenzie Prillaman
McKenzie Prillaman
Reporter

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login