Urgently needed: A funding mechanism to insulate cancer research from political whims

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Jonathan Mahler’s article in the Sept. 14 issue of The New York Times Magazine provided an excellent overview of the Trump administration’s assault on cancer research. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Paul W. Thurman, DBA
Professor of management and analytics, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Historically, the research initiatives of the Foundation for AIDS Research (amfAR) have focused on finding a cure for HIV. Four decades of HIV research have reshaped our understanding of the immune system, and insights from HIV have been leveraged in adjacent fields, including cancer immunology. Innovation can be bi-directional and reciprocal. Seminal findings in cancer immunology have also furthered understanding of HIV biology. 
The White House Office of Management and Budget has published a “Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance,” a proposed rule that seeks to fundamentally redraw the ground rules for all federally funded research. On the other side are America’s scientists who aren’t just crying foul—they are readying for a political fight.
Paul W. Thurman, DBA
Professor of management and analytics, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login