

Cover Story
By Alexandria Carolan
At first glance, the United States Supreme Court’s 303 Creative LLC. v. Elenis ruling has nothing to do with health care—but, looking deeper, experts in oncology and law are sounding alarms that the decision can be used to discriminate against LGBTQ+ patients.
In Brief


Clinical Roundup


Trending Stories
- Is it time to re-assess the practice and practicality of screening colonoscopy?
Modeling data, ACS guideline support greater use of noninvasive tests to ease system strain, help save lives - The Directors: Two Gulf Coast cancer center directors on why NCI designation matters—and why they want it
Lucio Miele and Raghu Kalluri: Science and technology have changed what an aspiring cancer center must accomplish - From “default dead” to living the future of cancer care
As founding CEO of GitLab, I went “founder mode” on my osteosarcoma - Brian Wolpin celebrates FDA approval of daraxonrasib in pancreatic cancer as the future of the field
- FDA advisory committee votes in favor of Galleri approval, but calls for removal of “early” detection claims
Clinical benefit will not be considered for approval, FDA says - Trump weighs—and abandons—an executive order that would give OMB veto power over NIH grants















