

Cover Story
Guest Editorial
Over and over again, I’ve seen the same missteps, clumsy excuses, and faulty logic during sponsor presentations to the FDA Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee, repeated as if part of a tragic, regulatory update to the movie Groundhog Day.
In Brief


Clinical Roundup


Drugs & Targets


Trending Stories
- Is it time to re-assess the practice and practicality of screening colonoscopy?
Modeling data, ACS guideline support greater use of noninvasive tests to ease system strain, help save lives - Oncologist Rachna Shroff endows award to outlast her cancer diagnosis
“Because of my health, I have a profound desire to see this endowment come to fruition now” - Michael Caputo appointed to President’s Cancer Panel
The cancer survivor and political operative says his appointment signals Trump’s interest in cancer, survivorship - KRAS pioneer and Stephenson Prize winner Frank McCormick aims to prevent all KRAS cancers with a pill
- From “default dead” to living the future of cancer care
As founding CEO of GitLab, I went “founder mode” on my osteosarcoma - Letai: MCEDs are a “great ideal”—alas, the data don’t support widespread use
“Projecting sub-ideal tests across a large population can cause harm,” Letai says, as Galleri cruises toward FDA approval














