NIH oncology peer reviewers are protesting the outcome of a recent meeting in which their own grant applications fared so poorly that the reviewers said they were penalized for their service.
Also in this 8-page issue: FISH assay predicts survival on Iressa, Univ. of Colorado Cancer Center study finds.
FDA advisors vote against recommending Johnson & Johnson’s Zarnestra for treatment of AML in the elderly.
Trending Stories
- “Backwater to Blockbuster” chronicles the previously untold story of the explosive growth of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
In a conversation with Deborah Doroshow, co-authors Chuck Sherr and Bill Evans discuss their collaborative writing process - DOJ alleges that Yale and UCLA discriminated based on race in medical school admissions
- How City of Hope is turning microbiome science into better cancer care
- Kennedy calls for a “moonshot” targeted on the role of the microbiome in cancer
- Mt. Sinai forms committee to probe Epstein links to breast center founder Eva Dubin, other faculty members
- FDA’s second rejection of Replimune’s melanoma treatment stirs worry among oncologists, patients
“Patients are owed another review.”









