NIH oncology peer reviewers are protesting the outcome of a recent meeting in which their own grant applications fared so poorly that the reviewers said they were penalized for their service.
Also in this 8-page issue: FISH assay predicts survival on Iressa, Univ. of Colorado Cancer Center study finds.
FDA advisors vote against recommending Johnson & Johnson’s Zarnestra for treatment of AML in the elderly.
Trending Stories
- As daraxonrasib hits the clinic, Frank McCormick says RAS is bigger than pancreatic cancer
- Is it time to re-assess the practice and practicality of screening colonoscopy?
Modeling data, ACS guideline support greater use of noninvasive tests to ease system strain, help save lives - Maura Gillison, who identified the role of HPV in head and neck cancer, changing the standard of care, dies at 61
- Cancer leaders play “musical chairs” as executive jobs fill at top cancer centers
Lee replaces Pisters at MD Anderson, Tuveson moves to Duke, and Mitchell is named director at University of Florida - From “default dead” to living the future of cancer care
As founding CEO of GitLab, I went “founder mode” on my osteosarcoma - KRAS pioneer and Stephenson Prize winner Frank McCormick aims to prevent all KRAS cancers with a pill









