How to navigate early clinical development and support robust registrational strategy and late-stage development in oncology

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The clinical development strategy in oncology during the last decade has been substantially affected in several ways by the advent of immunotherapy1, and more recently, cell and gene therapy2 treatment options. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Tanja Obradovic, PhD
Vice president, Scientific Affairs, Medical Affairs Oncology, ICON Biotech
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Two drug combinations, Tecvayli (teclistamab-cqyv) + Talvey (talquetamab-tgvs), a BCMA and GPRC5D dual antigen targeting regimen, and Talvey + pomalidomide (Pomalyst, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb), demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival compared with investigator’s choice standard of care for adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received 1 to 4 prior lines of therapy, including an anti-CD38 antibody and lenalidomide. 
Chronic, low-grade inflammation in the body—a phenomenon known as “inflammaging” because it increases with age—has been linked to many leading causes of illness and death, including cancer, heart disease, metabolic conditions, and neurodegenerative diseases. But scientists have struggled to understand what causes inflammaging or how to reverse its effects.
Tanja Obradovic, PhD
Vice president, Scientific Affairs, Medical Affairs Oncology, ICON Biotech

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login