How to navigate early clinical development and support robust registrational strategy and late-stage development in oncology

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The clinical development strategy in oncology during the last decade has been substantially affected in several ways by the advent of immunotherapy1, and more recently, cell and gene therapy2 treatment options. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Tanja Obradovic, PhD
Vice president, Scientific Affairs, Medical Affairs Oncology, ICON Biotech
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Thomas J. Lynch Jr. and Howard A. “Skip” Burris III lead two institutions that couldn’t be more different—an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center on one side of the country and a for-profit research enterprise on the other—but they stay up at nights worrying about the same thing.
Positive high-level results from the POTOMAC phase III trial showed one year of treatment with Imfinzi (durvalumab) plus standard-of-care BCG induction and maintenance therapy demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival for patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer compared to BCG induction and maintenance therapy alone.​
Tanja Obradovic, PhD
Vice president, Scientific Affairs, Medical Affairs Oncology, ICON Biotech

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login