Why CAR-T policymaking is broken, and why we need to fix it

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The initial reports of the near-miraculous benefits of CAR-T in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia generated tremendous excitement—there was a Lazarus-like quality to these stories.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Michael Kolodziej
Vice president and chief innovation officer, ADVI Health
Louis Jacques
Chief clinical officer and senior vice president, ADVI Health; Former director of the Coverage and Analysis Group, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Marc Samuels
Chief executive officer, ADVI Health
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

With the recent FDA approval of daratumumab for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma, the moment is ripe to revisit the evolution of our understanding of smoldering multiple myeloma. This development not only underscores the growing recognition of early intervention but also invites a broader reflection on the biological insights and therapeutic strategies that have shaped—and continue to shape—this transitional disease state.
Michael Kolodziej
Vice president and chief innovation officer, ADVI Health
Louis Jacques
Chief clinical officer and senior vice president, ADVI Health; Former director of the Coverage and Analysis Group, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Marc Samuels
Chief executive officer, ADVI Health

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login