NCI’s Penberthy: We may be seeing some impact of treatment in lung cancer mortality, but we need more data

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

If the mortality rate for lung cancer is starting to fall of a cliff in part because of treatment effect—contributing to more than a third of the 2.2% decline in overall cancer mortality from 2016 to 2017—is that signal showing up on the radar of NCI’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program?

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Matthew Bin Han Ong
Matthew Bin Han Ong
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

On Feb. 19, GRAIL Inc. announced that its pivotal NHS-Galleri trial failed to meet its primary endpoint of reduction in advanced stage cancers. The media and the market reacted as one would expect: GRAIL’s stock price halved the day after the announcement and at least three law firms said that they are conducting investigations in preparation for filing investor suits.
If you listen to GRAIL executives discuss the results of the long-awaited trial of the company’s multicancer detection test, you might be led to conclude that the company’s pivotal NHS-Galleri study had an overwhelmingly positive result.
Undeterred by the negative topline result of its pivotal trial of Galleri, a multicancer detection test, the test’s sponsor, GRAIL, said it’s forging ahead with its plan to get FDA approval and reimbursement from CMS and private insurers.
Matthew Bin Han Ong
Matthew Bin Han Ong

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login