Federal judge nixes FDA’s LDT rule, says agency exceeded its authority

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

A federal judge ruled that the FDA lacks the statutory authority to regulate laboratory developed tests, finding squarely in favor of plaintiffs in the consolidated lawsuits brought by American Clinical Laboratories Association, Association for Molecular Pathology, and others. ASCP submitted an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Rick Pazdur, MD, the newly appointed director for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the FDA, has been described as “greyhound thin” as a result of his dedication to cycling and lifting weights in the gym each day and, for a long time, a vegetarian diet. I first met him when he was the director of the Office of Oncology Drug Products (ODP) within CDER, in 2009.
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and Vinay Prasad, FDA’s chief medical and scientific officer and director of the agency’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, jointly published a letter in The New England Journal of Medicine spelling out the rationale for FDA’s new “plausible mechanism pathway,” aimed at getting bespoke therapies to market without the need for a randomized controlled trial. 
FDA has approved Hyrnuo (sevabertinib), an oral, reversible, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer whose tumors have HER2 tyrosine kinase domain activating mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test, and who have received a prior systemic therapy.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login