publication date: Aug. 3, 2018
House committee defoliates NIH funding for WHO program that declares weedkiller Roundup a carcinogen
By Jordan Williams
The House Committee on Appropriations has withheld funding for the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer—which receives about $2 million from the United States per year—because of controversy over the agency’s label for glyphosate, a chemical commonly used in weedkillers.
In a March 2015 review of five agents—four insecticides and glyphosate—IARC labeled the weedkiller as “probably carcinogenic in humans,” based on limited evidence in humans for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and “sufficient evidence” in animals.
IARC conducted the review via its Monographs Programme, which is designed to identify environmental factors that can increase the risk of cancer. The program’s evaluations are watched by health agencies worldwide.
IARC’s conclusions on glyphosate, made by a working group of 17 scientists from 11 countries, ran counter to guidelines of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the European Food Safety Authority. EPA said glyphosate has “low toxicity to humans,” and an EFSA study in November 2015 found glyphosate “unlikely to be carcinogenic.”
The IARC working group was chaired by Aaron Blair, a retired NCI epidemiologist.
Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the world. It was first discovered by a … Continue reading House committee defoliates NIH funding for WHO program that declares weedkiller Roundup a carcinogen
To access this members-only content, please log in.
Institutional subscribers, please log in with your IP
If you're not a subscriber why not join today?
To gain access to the members only content click here
You will be given immediate access to premium content on the site.Click here to join.