A “new normal” for NCI-sponsored clinical trials is long overdue

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

I read with interest the recently published story on the recommendations to streamline data collection in certain NCI trials presented at the Nov. 9, 2022, meeting of the Clinical and Translational Research Committee (The Cancer Letter, Nov. 11, 2022).

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Richard L. Schilsky, MD, FACP, FSCT, FASCO
Professor emeritus, University of Chicago; Former chief medical officer and executive vice president, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Former chair, Cancer and Leukemia Group B
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Data from the phase III ASCENT-03 study demonstrated a highly statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival for Trodelvy (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy) compared to chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who are not candidates for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. 
Keytruda (pembrolizumab) plus Padcev (enfortumab vedotin-ejfv) reduced the risk of event-free survival events by 60% and reduced the risk of death by 50% when given before and after surgery (radical cystectomy) versus surgery alone, the current standard of care, in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who are not eligible for or declined cisplatin-based chemotherapy, according to phase III KEYNOTE-905/EV-303 trial data. 
Richard L. Schilsky, MD, FACP, FSCT, FASCO
Professor emeritus, University of Chicago; Former chief medical officer and executive vice president, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Former chair, Cancer and Leukemia Group B

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login