UMich develops app that calculates risk of delaying cancer care during COVID-19

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

A team of data scientists and cancer doctors from the University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center and the U-M School of Public Health developed a free, web-based application to compare the long-term risk for a patient whose cancer treatment was postponed.

The OncCOVID app draws on national cancer data sets to help assess the risk of immediate treatment versus delayed treatment, depending on a patient’s individual characteristics, as well as on COVID’s impact on their local community.

“We also see the app providing additional reassurance to oncologists and their patients when the data show that delaying treatment will likely have little or no impact on a patient’s long-term outcome,” the project’s lead researcher, Holly Hartman, a doctoral student in biostatistics at U-M, said in a statement.

OncCOVID could also be used by health care systems resuming care and need to prioritize a backlog of patients.

“Hospitals have basically been using a three-tiered system during COVID: treat, delay a little, or delay a lot,” Daniel Spratt, associate professor of radiation oncology at Michigan Medicine and one of the senior researchers on the project, said in a statement. “Unfortunately, this tiered system is an extremely blunt instrument. Our goal was to create a resource that could be tailored both to the individual patient and to their local community.”

The app allows doctors to enter more than 45 characteristics about a patient — including their age, location, cancer type and stage, treatment plan, underlying medical conditions, and the proposed length of a delay in care. It then calculates the patient’s likely five-year survival following immediate treatment and delayed treatment.

Under the hood, the app draws on millions of records contained in the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry and the National Cancer Database, combined with county-level COVID infection data from Johns Hopkins University.

Advanced features allow all of the app’s underlying statistical assumptions to be adjusted, such as the baseline mortality risk from COVID and the disease’s infection rate. In the future, the researchers plan to use the same data model to start looking at the effects that treatment delays due to the coronavirus pandemic may have on cancer mortality nationally, Hartman said.

Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

For nearly 25 years, business executive Lou Weisbach and urologist Richard J. Boxer have argued that finding the money to finance the cures for devastating diseases is not as difficult as it appears. To start finding the cures, the U.S. Department of the Treasury needs to issue some bonds—$750 billion worth. Next, you hire CEOs—one...

There is general agreement that the United States spends too much on health care, especially on pharmaceuticals.  But what we spend on drugs is not simply a function of price. If eggs double in price, people can simply cut the number of eggs they eat in half.  Simply stated, cost is the product of (price per unit times the number of units purchased). 
What did President Richard M. Nixon and Senator Edward M. Kennedy have in common? They each played a pivotal role in the passage of the National Cancer Act signed by Nixon on Dec. 23, 1971. The NCA established the National Cancer Program authorizing the initial investment in the NCI-designated Cancer Centers Program. 
When I first proposed targeting PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) as a therapeutic approach, the response I got was: “No one will ever make a drug against PCNA. It’s undruggable.” The protein lacks enzymatic activity, has a disordered region, and binds to over 200 other proteins within the cell. From a traditional drug development perspective, these characteristics made PCNA an impossible target.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login