CBER’s All-Day Voyage into Slippery Science Ends in 18-6 Vote against Bladder Drug

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

One might surmise that by the time FDA asks an advisory committee to vet an application, the questions would deal primarily with clinical utility.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Paul Goldberg
Editor & Publisher

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

With major leadership changes, grant disruptions and terminations, and a stoked distrust in science, Steven Artandi, the director of Stanford Cancer Center, worries that young investigators will feel disenchanted by the U.S. research atmosphere and take their work and study elsewhere. 
Cancer care is evolving at an unprecedented pace. Practitioners feel the mounting pressures daily: rising cancer rates—particularly in younger patients—a growing population of older cancer survivors, rapid growth in new care and treatment options, and navigating heightened fiscal constraints and uncertainty. 
Paul Goldberg
Editor & Publisher

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login