Don Berry: In NeoALTTO & ALTTO Trials, Neoadjuvant Response Predicts Adjuvant

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

An article in the June 6 issue of The Cancer Letter described plenary presentations at ASCO 2014. One presentation was the adjuvant breast cancer clinical trial ALTTO in HER2-positive disease, which “was chosen [for the plenary session] because it addressed the reliability of pathological complete response as a surrogate for patient benefit.” The article and much ASCO and post-ASCO rhetoric in the breast cancer community focused on the conclusion that ALTTO failed to show a statistically significant benefit in disease-free survival (DFS) for combination lapatinib/trastuzumab in comparison with trastuzumab, both on a backbone of chemotherapy. This was despite a statistically significant benefit in pathological complete response (pCR) in NeoALTTO, the neoadjuvant version of ALTTO.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Donald A. Berry
Professor of biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

The rapid adoption of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), particularly for weight management, represents one of the most significant shifts in metabolic medicine in decades. With millions of people now using medications such as semaglutide and tirzepatide, we are witnessing a fundamental alteration in patient physiology that extends far beyond glucose control and weight loss. As these drugs approach 10% population penetrance in some demographics, the oncology community faces an urgent question: How will this metabolic transformation reshape cancer care?
Donald A. Berry
Professor of biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login