Counter-Point: George Sledge Responds To Berry’s Letter: Neoadjuvant Doesn’t Predict Adjuvant In Breast Cancer
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Richard Pazdur, FDA’s top oncologist who last week received a battlefield promotion to the role of director of the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, is described as a stabilizing figure respected by major patient groups, oncology professional societies, and the industry.


Rick Pazdur’s appointment as director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) comes at exactly the right moment, both for the agency and for the patients it serves.


Top FDA officials said the agency is in the process of removing the black box safety warnings from all forms of menopausal hormone therapy, including creams, pills, and other treatments prescribed to ease the symptoms of menopause and perimenopause.


With the recent FDA approval of daratumumab for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma, the moment is ripe to revisit the evolution of our understanding of smoldering multiple myeloma. This development not only underscores the growing recognition of early intervention but also invites a broader reflection on the biological insights and therapeutic strategies that have shaped—and continue to shape—this transitional disease state.


The landscape of cancer treatment is rapidly evolving. Increasingly, there is recognition that care must go beyond treating the disease itself—it must also address the whole person and the debilitating symptoms patients experience during and after treatment.





