Letter to the Editor

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Dear Editor,

We are writing to clarify a few points in your Oct. 2 article, “CMS to Trim Spending on Diagnostic Lab Tests,” as it mistakenly intertwines two issues.

On Friday, Sept. 25, 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released three separate items related to molecular diagnostics: 1) the 2015 Final Gapfill rates; 2) the Preliminary Determinations for the Calendar Year 2016 Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule; and, 3) the Medicare Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Tests Payment System Proposed Rule (as required under PAMA Section 216).

In the 2015 Gapfill rates the payment rate for Oncotype DX test for breast was reduced. Yesterday, CMS announced a technical correction to this payment rate and Genomic Health issued a release.

In the CY2016 Preliminary Determinations, CMS recommended payment rates that, if finalized, would represent drastic reductions of 30% up to 90% in payment rates for several well-established, Medicare covered advanced diagnostic laboratory tests. CMS has since announced a public expert Advisory Panel meeting on October 19th. The Coalition and member companies plan to present and we believe this an opportunity for CMS to correct the rates and issue a Final Determiantion of gapfill for 2016. The gapfill recommendation would have the effective of leaving pricing to the Medicare contractors, thus allowing MACs to continue with their current pricing. We think this is consistent with CMS policy, the August Advisory Panel recommendation, and the PAMA statute.

In the Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Tests Payment System Proposed Rule CMS included a restrictive definition for Advanced Diagnostic Laboratory Tests (ADLTs) that would exclude tests based on an analysis of proteins. These advanced diagnostic tests provide physicians with specific information for managing the care of patients with complex conditions, like cancer, heart transplants, cardiovascular disease and rheumatoid arthritis. C21 plans to submit comments in the next month on the Proposed Rule.

Sincerely,
The Coalition for 21st Century Medicine

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

When our hematological malignancy testing pilot project began in Eldoret, Kenya, there seemed to be a mismatch in relation to progress in healthcare. The region, like much of sub-Saharan Africa, had been focusing on combatting infectious diseases such as HIV and malaria—which was much-needed—yet cancer care was under-resourced. 
Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming biomedical research and healthcare. Large language models, foundation models, and AI agents are increasingly being deployed to assist with data interpretation, literature review, clinical decision support, and translational research. 
In modern oncology, important insights from clinical trials often emerge years after initial publication. As new therapies extend survival and transition more patients into long-term remissions, clinicians and researchers are increasingly looking beyond initial response rates to understand durability, long-term safety, and even the possibility of a cure. 

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login