COA opposes home infusion for cancer, citing safety concerns

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The Community Oncology Alliance board of directors released a position statement opposing the home infusion of chemotherapy, cancer immunotherapy, and cancer treatment supportive drugs because of serious patient safety concerns.

The home infusion of cancer treatments by a provider who may not be a trained oncology nurse and may not recognize or be prepared to treat any of the serious adverse reactions that frequently occur is of significant concern, the statement said.

Many of the side effects caused by cancer treatment can have a rapid, unpredictable onset that places patients in incredible jeopardy and can even be life-threatening. Home infusion negates the benefits of the expertise and team approach to cancer care, which are the hallmarks of community oncology, within facilities specifically designed for safe and effective cancer drug infusions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced all health care providers and care settings to dramatically adjust operations. Independent, community oncology practices have quickly adapted and are taking extreme measures to keep their facilities and providers COVID-19 free so that their patients in active treatment can be assured of a safe environment. The recent, major expansion of telehealth services and relaxation of regulations has provided oncologists with a powerful tool to do this by monitoring patients and ensuring that only those that are in urgent need of treatment come into the practice.

The COA home infusion position statement notes that there are other medical specialties and diseases where the infusion of Medicare Part B drugs at home may be reasonable during the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, the position is currently limited to opposition for the home infusion of cancer treatments.

Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

In last week’s issue of The Cancer Letter, Jacquelyn Cobb, associate editor, wrote a story about the then-promising legislative package that was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives Jan. 22. At the time, the package was expected to pass in the Senate, provide funding for the federal government through fiscal year 2026, and prevent a government shutdown that looms Jan. 30. 
A story is told that after first obtaining approval for marketing Premarin in 1942, Wyeth Laboratories didn’t lock up the secret recipe for making the hormonal drug in a company safe, to be guarded by patent lawyers.
The U.S. House of Representatives Jan. 22 passed a three-bill minibus package that is expected to be the grand finale of the drama of the fiscal year 2026 appropriations process. The package, which funds the HHS as well as the departments of Defense, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Labor, and Education, gives NIH and NCI modest raises over FY25, and nullifies several  aggressive cuts the White House had proposed for NIH.
This past summer, the organization I lead, formerly known as The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, announced our new name: Blood Cancer United. It reflects our ongoing commitment to the entire blood cancer community—patients, families, caregivers, researchers, healthcare professionals, and partners—and our work to advance progress for those impacted by all types of blood cancer. 

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login