Surgeries resume at National Cancer Institute in Kyiv. Credit: Oleksandr Stakhovskyi
OS: That’s a funny story. Since everybody would like to help Ukrainians, what is happening right now is that our fellow institutions—European centers and even American centers—are starting to open positions for doctors in Ukraine, as research fellows.
But, since it’s only for girls, it’s kind of sexist. We are sending our girls out—I had a colleague who went to Germany for a two-year fellowship, and it was like a flash. She asked the professor, he said, “Yes, we can do it,” and next week she was already there. Everybody is so eager to help by opening positions.
And, really, we have at least three or four different associations or organizations who started to open hubs to receive resumes and CVs of our doctors, to try to help them enter other European countries’ systems, if they are already refugees, if they’re already dislocated from Ukraine.
But if you are in Ukraine, we can send only females, taking into account that it’s not going to be the same way of life we’re used to at least for the next year.
I mean, if you are a younger doctor, it’s definitely a good chance for you to go somewhere, to study something extra. That’s why I’m definitely motivating all my younger female doctors whom I talk to, that it’s a good opportunity to go and get a fellowship.
But you won’t be leaving anytime soon, it sounds like.
OS: I mean, I’m not young anymore, so I did my fellowships. I’m pretty confident with that. I feel that for myself, and there are a number of doctors in my institution who are already kind of established—so, we will not have a huge problem with getting patients.
Even though lots of people left Ukraine, you still have lots of cancer patients who stayed within the country.
And since I’m a surgeon, we know that surgery is still mainstream for the majority of cancer patients. We obviously have combination treatments, and, as I told you, chemotherapy is almost totally normal right now.
Our radiation program will start next week. So, in our institution, the National Cancer Institute, the radiation department will start to work like previously from Monday.
How are medical supplies looking? I remember last time there was some strain.
OS: That’s another issue that we had. Our ministry is very focused on what we are currently getting. We have tons of humanitarian aid right now. It’s not always the drugs we would like to receive, but again, when we are talking about cancer patients, you are not looking for a second or third or fourth line of systemic treatments.
You are still looking for basic regimens and for basic drugs. I mean, you don’t need immunotherapies, which are crazy expensive to bring to Ukraine, to give to a patient who is dying because he’s not responding to the second-line systemic treatment—ipilimumab or nivolumab, or very fancy new drugs.
So, when we are talking about the lack of drugs—I told you last time, we had MSD, who donated pembrolizumab or immuno drugs to Ukrainian patients. You have others who are still donating some other drugs, which are very expensive in Ukraine to patients.
But, since we know that this shift of patients from Ukraine, where lots of people left Ukraine already with cancer, the remaining part will definitely have enough.
We have nice communication between oncocenters and their chiefs. They have a system where they can share with each other if something is lacking in one region or fully loaded with medications, in Dnipro or Zaporizhzhia—they can always share.
The major problem right now is for those cities that are blocked, that you are not able to get humanitarian aid into, or to get patients out safely. That’s probably the major problem for all the cancer patients who are staying within those cities. At that moment, you realize that it’s not even about cancer, it’s about survival.
Patients and doctors and kids and families and civilians and armies are locked in one city, like Mariupol, for example, or Kharkiv—they’re always bombing Kharkiv, but we still have patients who are coming to our institution to receive drugs, and then they’re going back to Kharkiv because they live there, which sounds unusual, but it happens.
But what is happening in those crazy towns like Mariupol, which has been locked already for the last month, we don’t have any information out of there, we don’t have any possibility to bring out people, like civilians, so we are not even talking about cancer patients. We are not able to bring civilians out. So, in those cities, they will receive help within the systems they have left.
So, lots of variety, still, between different cities.
OS: Really, there is not a huge number of these occupied cities. We are talking only about, probably, Mariupol. We have limited connection and limited access to Kherson, and Mykolaiv, which is not very far from Kherson.
I was talking to doctors yesterday—they have a nice humanitarian supply and they have doctors working in the oncological service. The issue is just that it’s a little bit more dangerous than in Kyiv, but anyhow they still manage to do some surgeries.
We have nice communication between oncocenters and their chiefs. They have a system where they can share with each other if something is lacking in one region or fully loaded with medications, in Dnipro or Zaporizhzhia—they can always share.
I did talk yesterday with a general surgeon from Kherson—he was consulting with me about a patient with a tumor in his kidney.
I was saying, “I mean, if this resection may be done as a partial resection, perhaps it should be done lap [laproscopically].” And he’s saying, “I’ve never done lap.”
So I said, “Just send me the patient.” He said, “Oh, it’s impossible to send you the patient because we are locked. So, I may do an open surgery, because I have that experience.”
That’s what is happening right now, is that even though those cities are semi-blocked, they’re still finding a way of doing surgeries. That sounds kind of crazy when you are sitting somewhere in the States—doing surgeries when you have a war next to you. But I think that’s what’s happening here. Everything is relative to the situation we have around.
I think patients, if they’re not able to leave the city and they know they have a tumor, they go to the hospital. The doctor might say, “We are in the city and we are blocked, but you need my help. I will do this.”
They’re not supposed to shoot the hospital, because they have already blocked the city. So, I think somehow those doctors manage to go into surgery with their patients. But I don’t have a proper understanding, because I’m not there.
It’s hard for me to describe to you the reasons why in that kind of critical situation this doctor will go into surgery, even doing an unusual surgery for him.
I mean, by being a general surgeon, you will not do a kidney tumor, because it’s a partial resection. It’s a kind of bloody surgery that needs specific training. It’s hard for me to understand, but that’s what’s happening.
Is there anything that we’ve missed or anything else you’d like to share?
OS: We might talk about the humanitarian help which is coming from abroad. We are having loads of boxes from different centers to the National Cancer Institute.
We are sharing with other hospitals in Kyiv. We are able to send this humanitarian aid to Mykolaiv. The cities that really need that would be those that are currently blocked and locked, but again, that’s just two or three cities.
So, I feel that we receive a lot of help from outside, and people feel they help, because if they’re not able to come, they can send aid, or they can keep our patients—for example, they can give them surgeries.
That’s what I’ve heard from my colleagues from other specialties, that a number of the patients were operated on in Germany totally for free. Pancreatic cancers or big complex surgeries were already done for our patients somewhere in Europe, absolutely for free, because Ukrainians with cancer came to those centers. So that is happening, which is really nice of our European colleagues.
We have this huge initiative from St. Jude hospital, which is a children’s hospital in the States. They’re making a huge initiative with our ministry and our NGO, which is called Tabletochki, and they send all the kids with cancer away. They put them into some special hub hospital in Lviv.
Then, they send them to a Polish hub, and from the Polish hub, depending on the stage, depending on the disease, they translate all the medical information and distribute those kids across Europe. Some patients who really need it even flew to Canada or the States to receive oncological help, but that’s a totally different story. It’s definitely not my story.
That sounds very interesting. It seems that there’s been a big push to get pediatric cancer patients out of the country.
OS: Yeah. It’s kind of easier with them, you know? Because, when you have an adult patient, they can choose, they can say, “Oh, I don’t want to wait weeks, I will go to Germany, they will do it faster; I don’t want this guy, I read the news that that professor is bad or the surgeon is better; that treatment may suit me better.”
But with kids, it’s more parents who don’t know what to do. So, if somebody’s saying that St. Jude Hospital is a huge name, and they recommend this, everybody usually takes this as proper advice and follows the recommendation.
And since there are fewer kids, it’s definitely manageable numbers. It’s easier to organize all of them to hubs—just go in, translate their medications, and send them. And that’s it.
I think it’s more easy to organize because the whole mess of cancer patients as adults—some in remission, some in follow-up, some in an acute state, some in chemo, some whose chemo was suspended—it’s more hard to manage this mess and they are dislocated, so it’s different.
Thank you so much, again, and we’ll be in touch. Thank you for your time.
When Helene Brown, a cancer control pioneer who jokingly described herself as “the first in a long line of political oncologists,” delivered the keynote address at the Oncology Nursing Society annual meeting in 1990, she set forth bold predictions for the ensuing 20 years of the field: appointments conducted over “computerphone,” major genetic breakthroughs, and universal healthcare.
Photo credit: Oleksiy Samsonov; Kyiv, March 2022In Ukraine, a country of around 44 million people, over 1.3 million individuals currently live with cancer.
When air sirens sound over Kyiv, Ukraine, patients undergoing bone marrow transplants at Ohmatdyt National Children’s Hospital don’t have the option of going to the bomb shelter.
U.S. Deputy Secretary for Health and Human Services, Andrea Palm, and Sweden's Minister for Health Care, Acko Ankarberg Johansson, signing the agreement. Credit: Joel Apelthun/Government Offices of SwedenThe United States and Sweden signed an agreement to step up collaborations in science and technology by focusing on cancer research.
Many readers of The Cancer Letter will have seen or at least be aware of the buzz surrounding release of the new “Oppenheimer” movie, which has received excellent reviews.