The Cancer Letter

The leading source for information on the issues that shape oncology since 1973

Clinical

Clarification

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print
BYLINE
IN THIS ISSUE
DOWNLOAD PDFTABLE OF CONTENTS

Clarification

A guest editorial in The Cancer Letter stated that “work has halted on ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group’s landmark Tomosynthesis Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.” (The Cancer Letter, April 10, 2020) The TMIST breast cancer screening trial is not suspended. TMIST formally remains an ongoing study under the NCI and Cancer Trials Support Unit. Active participation at this time is at the discretion of individual sites. Sites are making critical local operational decisions to help manage any potential influx of COVID-19 patients and maintain the safety of patients and staff. As a result, some sites have suspended non-urgent health care services, such as screening mammography, and research operations.

Correction

A COVID-19 Update on April 24 reported that The Association of American Cancer Institutes annual meeting has moved to a virtual format (The Cancer Letter, April 24, 2020). The Association of American Cancer Institutes’ Clinical Research Innovation (CRI) program has moved its July 7-8 annual meeting to a virtual format. The AACI annual meeting, which takes place Oct. 11-13 in Kansas City, MO, is still scheduled as an in-person meeting at this time.

Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Conversation with The Cancer Letter

Lou Weisbach tells us about his plan to raise $750 billion for the American Center for Cures

For nearly 25 years, business executive Lou Weisbach and urologist Richard J. Boxer have argued that finding the money to finance the cures for devastating diseases is not as difficult as it appears. To start finding the cures, the U.S. Department of the Treasury needs to issue some bonds—$750 billion worth. Next, you hire CEOs—one...

By Otis W. Brawley and Paul Goldberg
ClinicalTrials & Tribulations

Optimizing dosing of expensive and toxic oncology drugs: Making America healthier

There is general agreement that the United States spends too much on health care, especially on pharmaceuticals.  But what we spend on drugs is not simply a function of price. If eggs double in price, people can simply cut the number of eggs they eat in half.  Simply stated, cost is the product of (price per unit times the number of units purchased). 
By Mark J. Ratain
Guest Editorial

Federal funding cutbacks undermine advances in cancer research and treatment
What would Richard Nixon and Ted Kennedy think?

What did President Richard M. Nixon and Senator Edward M. Kennedy have in common? They each played a pivotal role in the passage of the National Cancer Act signed by Nixon on Dec. 23, 1971. The NCA established the National Cancer Program authorizing the initial investment in the NCI-designated Cancer Centers Program. 
By Donald L. "Skip" Trump and Eric T. Rosenthal
Sponsored

From “undruggable” target to clinical potential: The journey of AOH1996

When I first proposed targeting PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) as a therapeutic approach, the response I got was: “No one will ever make a drug against PCNA. It’s undruggable.” The protein lacks enzymatic activity, has a disordered region, and binds to over 200 other proteins within the cell. From a traditional drug development perspective, these characteristics made PCNA an impossible target.
By Linda Malkas
Table of Contents

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login

Site license subscribers:
Log in with your IP | Register a sponsored account