Phase III persevERA study of giredestrant combination in ER-positive advanced breast cancer does not meet primary objective

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The phase III persevERA Breast Cancer study, evaluating investigational giredestrant in combination with palbociclib for people with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, did not meet its primary objective of a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population versus letrozole plus palbociclib, but a numerical improvement was observed. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

At the recommended regimen, 73% of patients receiving a pasritamig and JNJ-9401 combination, two bispecific antibodies designed to work together to drive the body’s immune response against advanced prostate cancer, achieved reductions of at least 50% in prostate-specific antigen, according to the results of a first-in-human phase I study. 
I have spent over 20 years running a tumor imaging metrics core at an academic cancer center. In that time, I have watched clinical trial enrollment concentrate at a relatively small number of flagship academic institutions. Unfortunately, trials do not propagate well to the community sites where most patients prefer to receive care. The explanations usually offered for why this happens have never fully accounted for what I observed.
In patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager, plus durvalumab as first-line maintenance therapy extended median overall survival by more than eight months, more than tripled progression-free survival, and reduced the risk of death by 58% compared to durvalumab alone, according to the results of the phase III open-label, multicenter, randomized DeLLphi-305 study. 

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login