Columvi combination extends OS in transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL in phase III trial

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

In the phase III STARGLO study of Columvi (glofitamab-gxbm) in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx) versus Rituxan (rituximab) in combination with GemOx (R-GemOx) for people with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who have received at least one prior line of therapy and are not candidates for autologous stem cell transplant, or who have received two or more prior lines of therapy, the Columvi regiment extended overall survival.

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

FDA approved Adcetris (brentuximab vedotin) in combination with lenalidomide and a rituximab product for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified (NOS), DLBCL arising from indolent lymphoma, or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL), after two or more lines of systemic therapy who are ineligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) or CAR T-cell therapy.
In a phase Ib/II clinical trial known as EPCORE NHL-2, a team of researchers—led by Joshua Brody, director of the Lymphoma Immunotherapy Program at the Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai—showed the benefit of combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The results were published earlier this month in the journal Blood. 
Genentech’s phase III SKYSCRAPER-01 study, evaluating tiragolumab combined with Tecentriq (atezolizumab) compared to Tecentriq alone for patients with PD-L1-high, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, did not reach the primary endpoint of overall survival at the final analysis. The overall safety profile observed remained consistent with longer follow-up, and no new safety signals were identified. The detailed data will be presented at a medical meeting in 2025.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login