AI could predict risk of lung cancer recurrence

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Computer scientists working with pathologists have trained an artificial intelligence tool to determine which patients with lung cancer have a higher risk of their disease coming back after treatment—part of Cancer Research UK’s landmark TRACERx study.

The AI tool was able to differentiate between immune cells and cancer cells, enabling researchers to build a detailed picture of how lung cancers evolve in response to the immune system in individual patients.

The paper was published in Nature Medicine May 27 and is showcased alongside eight other TRACERx publications on the Nature website.

Although this research is in its early stages, the approach could speed up how doctors predict which patients are more likely to see their lung cancer return, so they can be closely monitored with tailored treatment plans.

The AI tool—developed by researchers at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, in collaboration with scientists at University College London Cancer Institute and the Francis Crick Institute—was trained by pathologists to pick out immune cells from cancer cells. This allowed the tool to map out areas in tumours where the number of immune cells were high compared to the number of cancer cells, in patients with lung cancer.

Using the AI tool, the team found that while some parts of the tumor were packed with immune cells, described as hot regions, other parts of the tumour appeared to be completely devoid of them, which they described as cold regions.

When the researchers followed the progress of patients who had a higher number of cold regions, they found patients were at a higher risk of relapse.

This study is part of the TRACERx* (Tracking Cancer Evolution through therapy [Rx]) lung study—a £14 million, 9-year study funded by Cancer Research UK.

In the study, led by Yinyin Yuan, of The Institute of Cancer Research, and researchers from the UCL Cancer Institute and the Francis Crick Institute, AI pathology image-mapping technology was combined with next-generation sequencing. They used this tool to analyse samples from 100 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who took part in the TRACERx study.

The team’s work revealed that cancer cells found in immune cold regions may have evolved more recently than cancer cells found in immune hot regions that are packed with immune cells.

The researchers suggest that areas of the tumour with fewer immune cells may have developed a cloaking mechanism under evolutionary pressure from the immune system allowing them to hide from the body’s natural defences.

Their AI tool can assess how many regions with this cloaking mechanism exist within a tumor.

“Our research has revealed fresh insights into why some lung cancers are so difficult to treat, and we wouldn’t have been able to do this without the scale and scope of the TRACERx project,” Yuan said.

TRACERx is Cancer Research UK’s single biggest investment in lung cancer.

Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

For nearly 25 years, business executive Lou Weisbach and urologist Richard J. Boxer have argued that finding the money to finance the cures for devastating diseases is not as difficult as it appears. To start finding the cures, the U.S. Department of the Treasury needs to issue some bonds—$750 billion worth. Next, you hire CEOs—one...

There is general agreement that the United States spends too much on health care, especially on pharmaceuticals.  But what we spend on drugs is not simply a function of price. If eggs double in price, people can simply cut the number of eggs they eat in half.  Simply stated, cost is the product of (price per unit times the number of units purchased). 
What did President Richard M. Nixon and Senator Edward M. Kennedy have in common? They each played a pivotal role in the passage of the National Cancer Act signed by Nixon on Dec. 23, 1971. The NCA established the National Cancer Program authorizing the initial investment in the NCI-designated Cancer Centers Program. 
When I first proposed targeting PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) as a therapeutic approach, the response I got was: “No one will ever make a drug against PCNA. It’s undruggable.” The protein lacks enzymatic activity, has a disordered region, and binds to over 200 other proteins within the cell. From a traditional drug development perspective, these characteristics made PCNA an impossible target.

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login