Retraction is not refutation: Why chrono-immunotherapy still deserves scientific investigation

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

The recent retraction of the LungTIME-C01 randomized trial evaluating chrono-modulated immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer has ignited a vigorous debate regarding the promise of cancer chronotherapy. 

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Zachary S. Buchwald, MD, PhD
Associate professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Assistant director, Basic Sciences and Shared Resources, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University 
Michael C. Lowe, MD, MA
Associate professor, Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Disease team lead and chair, Melanoma Working Group, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University; Associate chief scientific officer, Clinical Research, Woodruff Health Sciences Center and Emory Healthcare
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Zachary S. Buchwald, MD, PhD
Associate professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Assistant director, Basic Sciences and Shared Resources, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University 
Michael C. Lowe, MD, MA
Associate professor, Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Disease team lead and chair, Melanoma Working Group, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University; Associate chief scientific officer, Clinical Research, Woodruff Health Sciences Center and Emory Healthcare

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login