Factors outside CAR T-cell therapy are associated with increased risk of secondary cancers after the treatment, meta-analysis shows

Subgroup analysis suggests risk of secondary cancers after CAR T-cell therapy is similar to risk after other therapies

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

A meta-analysis of 25 studies—totaling over 5,000 participants—focused on a question that has been troubling patients, physicians, and regulators: Does treatment with CAR T-cell therapy contribute to the development of secondary cancers?

To access this subscriber-only content please log in or subscribe.

If your institution has a site license, log in with IP-login or register for a sponsored account.*
*Not all site licenses are enrolled in sponsored accounts.

Login Subscribe
Table of Contents

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

FDA approved Itovebi (inavolisib) with palbociclib (Ibrance) and fulvestrant for adults with endocrine-resistant, PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth-factor receptor 2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, as detected by an FDA-approved test, following recurrence on or after completing adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Can you spare 10 minutes to complete a survey?

Your feedback is really important—you're helping us shape our coverage priorities and services to better serve you, our readers.

Login