Fitzpatrick: Brigham Retaliated Against My Constituents

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

This article is part of The Cancer Letter's How Medical Devices Do Harm series.

The text of Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick’s Nov. 5 letter to Ron Walls, executive vice president and chief operating officer at Brigham & Women’s Hospital, follows:

Dr. Walls,

As you may be aware, my constituent Dr. Amy Reed has been courageously battling an aggressive leiomyosarcoma that was spread throughout her body by a dangerous medical device known as a laparoscopic power morcellator.

This device has taken the lives of hundreds, if not thousands, of women since it was allowed on the market by the Food and Drug Administration. This tragic reality hangs over this mother of six’s head every single day.

And because of this, Dr. Reed and her husband, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, have passionately advocated for improved medical device safety to ensure no other family has to endure the same pain and heartbreak they and other have experienced.

But I write today because of a different concern raised in a Nov. 4, 2015 Boston Globe report. This report details how Dr. Reed’s husband was put under surveillance, targeted for enhanced security, and told if he did not submit to the terms ordered by Brigham that he would not be permitted to be by his wife’s side during her surgery to remove a third reoccurrence of her leiomyosarcoma.

As Dr. Reed’s and Dr. Noorchashm’s Representative in Congress, I am deeply concerned about what appears to be an effort to retaliate against their advocacy and silence their First Amendment Rights.

Dr. Reed chose Brigham because of its world-class surgery division. She knew the doctors at your hospital provided the best chance to take her one step closer to claiming victory in her battle to slay the aggressive leiomyosarcoma that is ravaging her body.

I hope the outcome of Dr. Reed’s surgery will prove to be successful, and I hope that she never has to be admitted as a patient to Brigham, or any other hospital for that matter, ever again to treat this cancer. But if she does, I hope that she and her husband are treated with dignity and respect—just as should any other family who are facing some of the darkest days in their lifetime.

Sincerely,
Mike Fitzpatrick
Congressman

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

The Trump administration did exactly what it said it would do to disorient anyone involved in making policy or touched by it. The president and his crew have “flooded the zone”—the term and the image are theirs, as is the strategy of dropping a flurry of executive orders and memoranda that shake the foundations of the American system of government, raising questions of legality and constitutionality, and, above all, making it a challenge for anyone to see the entire picture and think strategically.
In two raucous back-to-back hearings on Jan. 29 and Jan. 30, anti-vaccine crusader Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was grilled by members of the United States Senate Finance Committee and the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee as the Trump administration seeks his confirmation as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. 
Over the past century, groundbreaking cancer research in the U.S. has led to life-saving medical advances that benefit patients worldwide. Scientists often devote their lives to making discoveries, putting their scientific endeavors ahead of status, income, or lifestyle. Investigators work tirelessly, often seven days a week, to solve complex medical problems. These efforts often lead to game-changing outcomes that help us understand difficult medical challenges, advance technologies and develop new therapies. 

Never miss an issue!

Get alerts for our award-winning coverage in your inbox.

Login