NIH oncology peer reviewers are protesting the outcome of a recent meeting in which their own grant applications fared so poorly that the reviewers said they were penalized for their service.
Also in this 8-page issue: FISH assay predicts survival on Iressa, Univ. of Colorado Cancer Center study finds.
FDA advisors vote against recommending Johnson & Johnson’s Zarnestra for treatment of AML in the elderly.
Trending Stories
- Is it time to re-assess the practice and practicality of screening colonoscopy?
Modeling data, ACS guideline support greater use of noninvasive tests to ease system strain, help save lives - From “default dead” to living the future of cancer care
As founding CEO of GitLab, I went “founder mode” on my osteosarcoma - Mt. Sinai forms committee to probe Epstein links to breast center founder Eva Dubin, other faculty members
- A new AI tool enables speedy use of ASCO guidelines, eliminating typical errors
- KRAS pioneer and Stephenson Prize winner Frank McCormick aims to prevent all KRAS cancers with a pill
- Brian Wolpin celebrates FDA approval of daraxonrasib in pancreatic cancer as the future of the field









