NIH oncology peer reviewers are protesting the outcome of a recent meeting in which their own grant applications fared so poorly that the reviewers said they were penalized for their service.
Also in this 8-page issue: FISH assay predicts survival on Iressa, Univ. of Colorado Cancer Center study finds.
FDA advisors vote against recommending Johnson & Johnson’s Zarnestra for treatment of AML in the elderly.
Trending Stories
- The story of daraxonrasib is the ultimate hero’s journey
A narrative curve with twists, turns, intrigue, drama—and a blow to a mighty foe - At Senate hearing, Brown’s El-Deiry and other witnesses say they were targeted for arguing that mRNA vaccine may be linked to cancer
- Pancreatic cancer breakthrough came from smart scientists making smart bets—not from politicization of science
- Pancreatic cancer finally starts to budge as daraxonrasib doubles overall survival
- As his Senate testimony alleged danger from mRNA COVID vaccine, El-Deiry had an offer to run NCI Frederick lab
The job offer to run the lab—home to virus research, RAS Initiative, and data science—was quickly rescinded - Political appointees to be inserted into all stages of making research funding awards if OMB rule becomes final









